Expert talks by Judges from the Ukrainian Constitutional Court at the IRZ

  • Dr Stefan Hülshörster; Dr Matthias Hartwig; Prof Dr Ihor Slidenko, judge at the Ukrainian Constitutional Court; Prof. Dr Viktor Shyshkin, judge at the Ukrainian Constitutional Court; Dr Dieter Hömig; Dirk Mirow; Prof. Dr Petro Stetsiuk, judge at the Ukrainian Constitutional Court; Gennadiy Ryschkow; Jürgen Thomas, retired Under-Secretary; and Sascha Oettler, IRZ (from left to right)

    Dr Stefan Hülshörster; Dr Matthias Hartwig; Prof Dr Ihor Slidenko, judge at the Ukrainian Constitutional Court; Prof. Dr Viktor Shyshkin, judge at the Ukrainian Constitutional Court; Dr Dieter Hömig; Dirk Mirow; Prof. Dr Petro Stetsiuk, judge at the Ukrainian Constitutional Court; Gennadiy Ryschkow; Jürgen Thomas, retired Under-Secretary; and Sascha Oettler, IRZ (from left to right)

  • Dr Matthias Hartwig, MPI (Max Planck Institute) for Comparative Public Law and International Law; Dr Dieter Hömig, retired judge at the Federal Constitutional Court; Gennadiy Ryschkow, IRZ Kiev (interpreter); Dr Stefan Hülshörster, IRZ Deputy Director; and Dirk Mirow, IRZ Director (from left to right)

    Dr Matthias Hartwig, MPI (Max Planck Institute) for Comparative Public Law and International Law; Dr Dieter Hömig, retired judge at the Federal Constitutional Court; Gennadiy Ryschkow, IRZ Kiev (interpreter); Dr Stefan Hülshörster, IRZ Deputy Director; and Dirk Mirow, IRZ Director (from left to right)

Between 3 and 7 May 2015 we welcomed three acting Constitutional Court Judges from Ukraine, Professor Viktor Shyshkin, Professor Petro Stetsiuk and Professor Ihor Slidenko, at the IRZ's premises for three days of intensive expert talks. The focus was on the doctrine of constitutional law and reviews of members of the civil service and the judiciary.

The Ukrainian guests discussed constitutional control during a state's democratic transformation, control density of procedures and the role of a Constitutional Court as an essential factor in the political field with their German counterparts, Dr Dieter Hömig, retired judge at the Federal Constitutional Court, and Dr Matthias Hartwig of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. The talks focused on safeguarding judicial independence and steadfastness as well as on the question of how judicial self-confidence can be reinforced.

Another issue was the question of how to deal with the increasing influence of international law, and the impact of ECHR case law on the rulings of the Ukrainian Constitutional Court. This was of particular relevance, since it can be assumed that many of the imminent judicial reviews of so-called "lustration procedures" will have to be heard before the Ukrainian Constitutional Court and the ECHR. This is the reason why another focus of the talks was the question whether the reviews of an estimated 500,000 members of the civil service and the judiciary, many of whom have already been dismissed from public service, are lawful and proportionate. These reviews are currently being carried out in Ukraine on the basis of an "act on the consolidation of state power".

The guests from Ukraine held extensive and in-depth discussions with Under-Secretary Thomas Kunz from the Thuringia Ministry for Migration, Justice and Consumer Protection, who was himself in charge of matters relating to reviews of members of the judiciary in the former GDR, and Professor Thomas, retired Under-Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection, who was involved in negotiating the Unification Treaty, about the German experience after reunification with regard to reviews of judges and public prosecutors. The above-mentioned "act on the consolidation of state power" has already entered into effect, but it is currently being reviewed, following criticism from the European side. The IRZ also gave its opinion on this issue, as well as the Venice Commission. As a result, the proceedings regarding this act which were pending before the Ukrainian Constitutional Court have apparently now been suspended. To that extent the IRZ will not let up in its efforts to ensure that these reviews, which are definitely necessary in the Ukraine, are conducted according to rule-of-law standards.

Talks between Experts of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine and the Federal Administrative Court

Group photo

Group photo

Based on its more than 20 years of cooperation, the IRZ is implementing a five-pillar programme to promote the rule of law in Ukraine, supported by the Federal Foreign Office. Despite the extremely difficult domestic and international political conditions, the implementation of the programme has already been started. The programme covers issues of the constitutional and judicial reform, public law and criminal law as well as the fight against corruption, above all in the judiciary. The working visit of the representatives of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine, which took place from 25 to 28 November 2014, also continued a long-standing cooperation in establishing an administrative jurisdiction in Ukraine. Issues of protecting judicial independence and the necessary consolidation of an understanding of real independence by all parties played an important role during the expert talks, in particular against the background of the experiences gained in recent years and the current reform efforts.

In this context, the highly topical problem of the so-called lustration of civil service members and the judiciary as a whole were discussed. The judiciary will be reviewed as of early December 2014, including the Supreme Administrative Court, based on the requirements of the respective law. This review is certainly necessary in many cases but still has to be carried out in a reasonable way, bearing the principle of proportionality in mind. Another topical aspect was the effort of some forces in Ukraine to dissolve the administrative jurisdiction again and to integrate it into ordinary jurisdiction. An integration of commercial jurisdiction may be expedient; the dissolution of the administrative jurisdiction, however, which has been in existence for about a decade, would have to be considered as a drawback. Rather, more attention should be paid to developing the administrative courts further into an instrument capable of effectively and efficiently reviewing the activities of the state. For this purpose, they have to be truly independent and under no external influence at all, in order to contribute to a law-abiding conduct on the part of the executive.

The delegation was headed by the Court President Mr Netschytailo, who was only re-elected in June this year. They were received by the Vice-President of the Federal Administrative Court Dr Christ and the IRZ Deputy Director Dr Hülshörster. The meetings were also attended by the Presiding Judges Prof Dr Rubel and Mr Neumann as well as the Judges Prof Dr Kraft and Mr Steinkühler.

Commercial Senate of the Supreme Court of Ukraine Visits IRZ for Expert Talks

Ukrainian Delegation in the office of IRZ, September 2013

Ukrainian Delegation in the office of IRZ, September 2013

The Commercial Senate of the Supreme Court of Ukraine visited the IRZ in Bonn for expert talks, chaired by Senate President Barbara from 23 to 27 September 2013. The IRZ looks back on a close and trustful cooperation of long standing with the Supreme Court. The issues which were discussed included above all questions of the judicial reform and the related reformation of the law relating to the court constitution, case law and the entire procedural law, also involving the judges of the Supreme Court. After the Supreme Court had to put up with a loss of functions involving substantial staff reductions, also among the judges, as a consequence of the last reform of the judicial system, the focus was now on safeguarding the uniformity of the case law, which is one of today's central tasks of the Supreme Court, and the particularities of appeals on points of law only as well as the issue of a binding effect of rulings of the Supreme Court. The event furthermore focused on the areas of antitrust and competition law as well as the function of an honorary (commercial) judge and (intra and extra-judicial) mediation. The programme was supplemented by an exchange of practical experience at the Higher Regional Court of Cologne, at the Regional Court of Bonn as well as at the Bundeskartellamt [Federal Competition Authority]. The cooperation will be continued by a working visit of the Administrative Senate of the Supreme Court aimed at revising the code of administrative procedure which is scheduled for October 2013 as well as by an expert conference in Kiev in early 2014 dealing with uniformity in case law which will take place with all four senates together.