Constitutional jurisdiction under scrutiny

The President of the Jordanian Constitutional Court, Judge Mohammad Al Ghazo (third from right) after the symposium
The President of the Jordanian Constitutional Court, Judge Mohammad Al Ghazo (third from right) after the symposium
Jordan

How can constitutional norms be interpreted reliably and systematically? What methods are used to do this? And what role does social change play in case law?

These questions were the focus of a symposium held on 14 May 2025 in Amman, where judges from the Jordanian Constitutional Court joined Prof Dr Michael Eichberger, former judge at the Federal Constitutional Court, to examine key aspects of constitutional interpretation and decision-making.

The Court itself is still young – it was established in 2012 as part of constitutional reform to enable independent constitutional review for the first time. Since then, the IRZ has been advising the Jordanian Constitutional Court on various constitutional issues – always in an open and trusting exchange.

The expert presentations focused on the methodological foundations of constitutional interpretation – including teleological, systematic and historical approaches to interpretation – and their concrete application in case law.

A second priority was the practice of decision-making: How does a specific case develop into a constitutional court decision? What influence do precedents have? And how can social developments be integrated into the decision-making process? The influence of changing family values on the case-law of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Federal Constitutional Court's rulings on the wearing of headscarves were the subject of lively discussion.

The active role played by the President of the Jordanian Constitutional Court, Judge Mohammad Al Ghazo, who enriched the discussion with his insightful contributions, was particularly gratifying. The atmosphere was open and collegial – a good basis for professional exchange.

While the topic of constitutional interpretation was dealt with comprehensively, the IRZ sees further potential for in-depth events on the practice of decision-making, in particular on different forms of constitutional court decisions – for example on nullity, ex nunc or ex tunc effect, or legislative deadlines.

Conference on the principle of proportionality under constitutional law

Seminar in Amman ‘The primacy of the constitution and the principle of proportionality as a mechanism for controlling state action’.
Seminar in Amman ‘The primacy of the constitution and the principle of proportionality as a mechanism for controlling state action’.
Jordan

On 23 September 2024, IRZ, in cooperation with the Constitutional Court of Jordan, held a conference on the principle of proportionality, which is used to limit state interference in citizens' civil liberties.

The aim of the event was to strengthen the role of the constitutional jurisdiction in Jordan and thus to increase society's trust in the judiciary and in particular in the constitutional jurisdiction in the medium term.

In his lecture, Winfried Schubert, former president of the Saxony-Anhalt State Constitutional Court, presented developments in German constitutional jurisprudence, particularly with regard to the principle of proportionality. He explained how this principle serves as a guideline for the legal examination of state intervention and has received international attention.

In his presentation, Dr. Masaadeh, Secretary General of the Jordanian Constitutional Court, emphasised the stability of the constitution, which has been in force since 1952 and is protected by the establishment of the Constitutional Court in 2012. He explained in particular the two-tier system of legal remedies in Jordan and the function of the Constitutional Court as a body for judicial review.

Another item on the programme was a discussion of the latest rulings by the German Federal Constitutional Court, which clarified how the German principle of proportionality is applied. The event enabled an intensive exchange on these topics and contributed to enriching the experience of the Jordanian Constitutional Court.

Training seminar on arbitration in Amman

Seminar on arbitration with participants from the Jordanian Judicial Academy in Amman
Seminar on arbitration with participants from the Jordanian Judicial Academy in Amman
Jordanien

On 17 September 2024, the IRZ and the Jordanian Judicial Academy organised a training seminar for high-ranking judges of the Jordanian courts of cassation, appeal and first instance on arbitration.

His Excellency Mohammad Omar Maqansa, Director General of the Technical Office at the Court of Cassation, began by presenting arbitration and its judicial supervision in Jordan. He also discussed the application of international and bilateral arbitration agreements in the Jordanian legal system, such as the New York Convention of 10 June 1958 and the Riyadh Arbitration Convention.

This was followed by an introduction to the arbitration process in Germany, including a comparison of the different types of arbitration in Germany and in Jordan by Jan K. Schäfer, lawyer and partner at King & Spalding LLP, arbitrator and board member of the DIS.

The subsequent discussions showed that the topic of arbitration as part of out-of-court dispute resolution is also highly valued in Jordan.